Wikisocion talk:Links

I don't think that armleg socionics forum will work, because it has 80+ forums. Machintruc 12:37, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

is there a proper way to indicate that a forum is dead/dying (socionics.com and socionix)Bionicgoat 13:03, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Yes. Use the "minus" sign and write that it seems to be dying. (Admin 13:07, 21 June 2007 (CDT))

I went with "Forum has very little activity recently"... that sounds nicer :) Bionicgoat 13:15, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Is socionics.com dead/dying? I never registered there. Expat 21:20, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

it was the last time I was there... very little/no activity over a two week absence. Socionix is for all purposes dead, we only really trade one liners there now (and even that's pretty much died out) Bionicgoat 01:32, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Speaking of the identity of the Admin of armleg socionics forum -- that is Hugo. Expat 15:33, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Where did he get his information for the forums? Is it generally accessible in English or his own writings/translations? (Admin 15:55, 23 June 2007 (CDT))

I'd imagine that it's his own writting along with bad machine translations of Russian sites(he was always asking me to translate stuff for him) I haven't looked at it though (and didn't even know it was Hugo's until Expat said something)Bionicgoat 17:04, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

I just checked it out and it looks as if he's using bad babelfish translationsBionicgoat 17:49, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, probably of Lytov's paper where he lists all those small groups. Expat 17:50, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

On his indentity -- he registered with yet another username to PM some people to get them to go to the forum (not me though, obviously), and I've been told. Expat 18:01, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

just a question of aestetics

which do you guys think looks better?

very active forum on personality type theories but low emphasis on socionics

or

very active forum on personality type theories but

low emphasis on socionics

personally I think the second one with them on two different lines flows better... does anyone have an objection to changing it?Bionicgoat 17:18, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

lol OK I guess that's my answer :) Bionicgoat 17:26, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

added indents to the comments for a better lookBionicgoat 17:29, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Rick's sites

I assume he was being modest when he wrote the links list. I went ahead and gave socionics.us and his blog a well deserved for content ;) Bionicgoat 18:21, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

the16types

If enough people have similar complaints about the16types forum, we can summarize them with a sign and a comment or two. For example, we could write, "personal insults are not uncommon" or "some users complain of interpersonal intrigue and insults" or something like that. (Admin 05:57, 4 July 2007 (CDT))

ha, that might even attract some people to the forum! Expat 06:30, 4 July 2007 (CDT)

the rough part is how do we determine this. To me it just looks like one pissed ex-members opinion. Honestly I don't see where the 16t forum is worse than any other internet forum in this respect, which to me would have to be the case for it to get a special negative mention. Bionicgoat 20:14, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

That's fine. I'm not necessarily advocating a negative comment, but if 'enough' people have similar complaints (here we would want to look at the opinion of people who don't participate there), we could summarize them here. (Admin 00:54, 6 July 2007 (CDT))

cool... I guess this is this the part where we say "speak up people!" Bionicgoat 01:44, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

"Because of the free nature of the forum, the intertype relations are easy to follow."

Haha, very funny. Thehotelambush 00:13, 22 July 2007 (BST)